 | Dr. Dang Xuan Hop President of Hop Dang’s Chambers VIAC Arbitrator |
Whether settling disputes in Court or through arbitration, when a party has the burden of proof, it must submit evidence to the arbitral tribunal. The evidence can be in many different forms: Document electronic evidence, audio recordings, video recordings, witness statement, etc. In international arbitration practice, especially in complex disputes, a type of evidence that is frequently used by the parties to defend their opinion/request is testimony/report of "expert witness".
For example, a dispute arises between a Vietnamese enterprise and a foreign partner following a steel export. The dispute is brought to an arbitral tribunal, which can be constituted domestically (for example at the Vietnam International Arbitration Center) or abroad (for example at the Singapore International Arbitration Center) .
To interpret and convince the arbitral tribunal of the steel quality, reports containing specialized technical information[1] will usually be required as evidence. Therefore, the parties will either (i) select their own technical staffs to give testimony on the quality of steel; or (ii) invite an outside expert to provide reports who is usually an appraisal company or a reputable independent expert (usually a leading, reputable professor or expert in the industry and most importantly has no previous relationship with both parties) to confirm that the steel delivered conforms to the quality or not. This outside expert is the expert witness.
Most Vietnamese businesses or lawyers prefer the first approach, while enterprises or lawyers who are experienced in international litigation often choose the second option. It is because, in practice, an international arbitral tribunal is more likely to be persuaded by an expert witness’s evidence. Thus it usually decides in favor of parties providing the expert witness persuaded. What is the reason for this phenomenon?
Issues in dispute are often ambiguous, thus, there is no certain winning or losing probability since both parties are equally persuasive. Under such circumstances, the testimony of an independent expert is often rated “heavier”, by:
First: although the expert is hired by one party, the expert has never had any affiliation with either party prior to being invited to be an expert witness of the dispute; thus, the expert accesses the documents of the dispute in an objective manner and operates independently from the parties and from the disputed transaction[2]; therefore, the Arbitral Tribunal tends to deem the opinion of such an independent expert reliable and there is little likelihood that the expert will forge a report inconsistent with their knowledge to benefit their hirer. Whereas, the testimony of an employee in the company or of an appraisal company with a long-term relationship with a party may be considered lack of independence, objectivity and completeness, or even be viewed as manipulation for the sake of their company.
Second, when comparing the expertise and experience, enterprises’ employees rarely have similar professional qualifications and reputation with an independent expert who has many years of experience in researching, writing books, and lecturing about this topic[3]. During cross-examination, an employee’s lack of experience and knowledge might be exploited by the other party's lawyer, revealing the irrationalities which make their testimony seem unreliable to the Tribunal. Meanwhile, an expert is able to explain and defend their stance based on in-depth knowledge or experience as an expert witness in similar cases.
With more than 97% of surveyed enterprises responding they refer to arbitration as the method of resolving international disputes[4] and more than 92% of FDI enterprises in Vietnam refuse to use litigation for commercial disputes[5], it can be observed that the arbitration market has a lot of potential for development. Vietnamese lawyers, therefore, need to have an understanding of international best practices in arbitration and play well by the rules, so that when protecting the rights and interests of enterprises in arbitration proceedings, lawyers can devise appropriate strategies to improve the chance of winning in international arbitration advocacy./.
*This research paper is made to order by the Science Council under Vietnam International Arbitration Centre (VIAC) and only reflects the author’s opinion. VIAC uploads this paper on its official website with the aim of providing valuable information for the reference of the Arbitrators, the parties, other participants in the arbitral proceedings pursuant to VIAC’s Rules of Arbitration, as well as those who are interested in arbitration. Any reference and citation to this research made by a third party shall not be valid or recognized by VIAC. VIAC shall not explain or answer any requests or inquiries related to this research from a third party.
[1] Assessing the quality of goods is often less complicated than evaluating the quality of a task (for example, the construction of a factory building); But to simplify, I have taken an example of a sale of good transaction.
[2] In developed jurisdictions, there are professional consulting firms providing reputable experts in multiple fields: construction, finance, insurance, etc.
The ICC even has a unit dedicated to appointing experts service, including experts in creating reports to serve parties in international arbitration at ICC International Center for Expertise
[3] A typical example: Regarding matters that require the opinion of a legal expert, i.e.: how to understand and interpret the provisions of a country's law, parties often invite law professors at prestigious universities in that country to be expert witnesses and provide their opinions in expert reports. It is hard to assume that an employee in a corporate legal department would have similar knowledge and experience with a law professor in this case.
[4] Report of Queen Mary School - University of London 2018, page 05, http://www.arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/research/2018/
[5] Provincial Competitiveness Index (PCI)
Arbitration, and typically commercial arbitration, is an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) which is agreed by parties of the dispute. Arbitration can be used to replace the traditional way of litigation in court.
Derive from arbitration’s dispute settlement principles, arbitration shows many pros and brings many benefits for parties in commercial dispute, specifically as follows:
A Polish appeals court vacated an International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) partial award for alleged irregularities in the arbitrator's appointment (for further details please see " ICC award set aside due to irregularities in arbitrator's appointment "). The sole arbitrator's final award was also successfully challenged and set aside. The first reason to vacate the final award was also the issue of the sole arbitrator's appointment.
It is normal to inspect the goods that have been lost or damaged during the performance of the sales contract and in the contract of carriage. However, improper inspection can lead to significant disputes and damages that you can refer to below.
The ten years of Law on Commercial Arbitration 2010 (LCA) are also the 10-year development period of VIAC - the first institutional arbitration organization in Vietnam, the organization that goes along with the formation and advancement of the legal framework of commercial arbitration in Vietnam.
Law on Commercial Arbitration (“LCA”) enacted in 2010 was considered a major step forward for the development of commercial arbitration in Vietnam. Compared with the previous years and with international standards, LCA has made remarkable progress, namely recognizing enterprises’ freedom of choice, broadening the scope of arbitration, raising the arbitral tribunal’s authority, valuing court assistance (especially interim measures enforcement), encouraging flexibility in language of arbitration, and improving party’s autonomy in arbitration while maintaining proper manners during arbitral proceedings.
Mr. Doug Jones, a leading arbitrator in the international arbitration community, revealed to me his infatuation with the beautiful beach and Vietnamese delicacies after a seminar in Da Nang. He was also inspired by the confidence, assertiveness, competence and the ambition to improve domestic arbitrators to the same level as those working in the international sphere of young arbitrators and VIAC Secretaries.
Law on Commercial Arbitration 2010 (LCA)- the procedural law governing arbitration proceedings whose seat is in Vietnam
Nowadays, as the digital economy emerges, electronic agreements on online websites are becoming more and more prevalent; hence, the legal effect of establishing terms and conditions of service when accessing the website (browse-wrap) and clicking (click-wrap) are of particular interest. The following paper analyzes some of the legal aspects of online agreement conclusion, especially the establishment of the arbitration agreement by means of browse-wrap and click-wrap.
Whether settling disputes in Court or through arbitration, when a party has the burden of proof, it must submit evidence to the arbitral tribunal. The evidence can be in many different forms: Document electronic evidence, audio recordings, video recordings, witness statement, etc. In international arbitration practice, especially in complex disputes, a type of evidence that is frequently used by the parties to defend their opinion/request is testimony/report of "expert witness".
In international commerce and investment, parties to a dispute often select arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution other than litigation in which the court, an authorized state agency, adjudicate disputes. An explanation for this phenomenon is that arbitration may be the optimal means that the parties can exercise their autonomy in writing to select one or several individuals who are not representing state agencies and state power (the so-called private parties) to resolve disputes. However, to prevent the possibility of arbitrators "privatizing" justice, [1] the New York Convention and the ICSID Convention set out the rules for annulment of arbitral award when such award violates arbitral proceeding. Here, questions arise. What rules of procedure are violated? And to what extent is the commercial and investment arbitral award annulled? This article seeks to elucidate the theory and practice of annulment for violations of procedure under the New York Convention and the ICSID Convention.
Goods can be consolidated, batched, packed, sorted, and grouped for a certain period of time before being loaded onto a trailer for carriage to the consignee. Disputes about whether the time to do these things are within the scope of insurance liability or not is an issue worth knowing (through the lawsuit with the documents of a foreign law firm) below for readers’ reference.
Mr. Vu Anh Duong is the Secretary General of the Vietnam International Arbitration Centre (“ VIAC “), which is the leading Vietnamese arbitration and mediation institution . Mr. Duong has contributed significantly to the development of arbitration in Vietnam in various ways; in addition to his role with the VIAC, Mr. Duong has served as a member of various drafting committees dealing with not only the VIAC’s Rules of Arbitration (2017) (“ VIAC Rules ”), but also Vietnam’s arbitration-related legislation. He also regularly lectures on commercial arbitration and sits as an arbitrator in both international and domestic commercial arbitrations.
Abstract: This discourse focuses on a detailed analysis of some theoretical and practical issues about the application of interim emergency measures involving third parties, in the field of domestic and international. Besides, the discourse provides measures to enhance the ability to enforce the decisions applying interim emergency measures with the third parties within the realm of international arbitration law. Subsequently, it extracts experience and recommendations pertaining to the legal framework in Vietnam regarding this matter.
Besides many advantages, arbitration also reveals certain limitations, including the Arbitral Tribunal's limited jurisdiction over third parties. The question arises as to the need for accurately identifying cases of Arbitral Awards related to third parties and the possibility of the Court annulling these awards due to third parties, thereby, drawing lessons to minimize the risk of setting aside Arbitral Awards. Moreover, there is also a need for solutions to improve the mechanism for challenging Arbitral Awards which currently retain many shortcomings.
During arbitral proceedings, the mediation process may cause some certain conflicts that requests the Arbitral Tribunal to seriously consider. Resolving effectively these conflicts based on fundamental legal principles and the arbitration skills of the Tribunal will ensure the rights and interests of disputing parties and third parties. This discourse focuses on analyzing potential conflicts and providing recommendations to the Tribunal to maximize the effectiveness of the mediation process and reduce conflict occurrence.
.png)
According to the Department of Judicial Support , Ministry of Justice, currently , there have been 48 arbitration institutions established in our country, with over 600 arbitrators participating in resolving thousands of commercial disputes each year 1 . An arbitration service has been developed. Along with the growth , the trait of this service became more apparent , includi ng the relevance of third-party interests. Unlike court litigation, in principle, arbitration is a private dispute resolution method , therefore, the involvement of third parties is exceptional. The discourse discusses how the arbitral tribunal considers and guarantee s the third party's interest in the arbitra l proceedings by providing some situations in which disputing parties or the arbitral tribunal may need to consider the interests of third parties. The goal of arbitr ation is to make contributions to resolving disputes fairly, thereby encourag ing parties to fulfill their obligations voluntarily in order to avoid further dispute escalation of disputes . Based on the analysis , the author suggests policy improvements pertaining to third parties that may be considered in the upcoming revision of the Law on Commercial Arbitration.
.png "Trường đại học ngoại thương"){kind=logo}
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
