1. What is arbitration
Arbitration, and typically commercial arbitration, is an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) which is agreed by parties of the dispute. Arbitration can be used to replace the traditional way of litigation in court.
With such pros like simple procedure and flexibility as agreed by parties help parties to settle their dispute faster. Moreover, all stages of arbitration are confidential; hence, by using arbitration, entrepreneurs’ reputation are remained save.
2. Arbitration agreement
To submit the dispute for settlement before the arbitral tribunal, there should be an arbitration agreement entered into by disputing parties. Arbitration agreement represents the will of the parties that they agree to bring any legal claims arising out of a business relationship to be settled by arbitration. Arbitration agreement is usually found in the form of a clause/term in the contracts concluded by the parties, or it can be a separate agreement (an agreement to arbitrate). Arbitration agreement may be formed before or after the dispute arises.
In legal science, the arbitration was studied under many different levels and there are many definitions of arbitration:
According to the American Arbitration Association/ICDR (AAA): "Arbitration is a dispute resolution method by submitting the dispute to a number of objective consideration and settlement and they will make the final decision, valuable required the claimants to enforce ".
In Vietnam, according to Article 3 (1) of the Law on Commercial Arbitration 2010: "Commercial arbitration means a dispute resolution method agreed by the parties and conducted in accordance with the provisions of this Law.”
In the UNCITRAL Model Law, Article 7 (1) provides the meaning as follows:
“Arbitration agreement is an agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes which have arisen or which may arise between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not. An arbitration agreement may be in the form of an arbitration clause in a contract or in the form of a separate agreement.”
According to the New York Convention 1958, the arbitration agreement will be treated as an independent agreement, even if the arbitration agreement was expressed as a clause in the contract of the parties.
Arbitration agreement plays a fundamental role in determining the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal, while reflecting the freedom of the parties' agreement to arbitration.
The arbitration agreement may exclude the jurisdiction of the Court over the case.
3. Forms of arbitration
Commercial arbitration exists in two basic forms is ad hoc arbitration and administered arbitration.
(i) Ad-hoc arbitration:
Ad-hoc arbitration is a type of arbitration that is agreed by parties to establish in order to solve the case and will cease to exist when the incident is resolved. The nature of ad-hoc arbitration express through the following basic features:
- Established when disputes arise and terminated when the dispute is resolved.
- There is no arbitration institution, no permanent system, no list of arbitrators. Arbitrators selected by the parties or appointed by other arbitrators may be the person named in or outside the list of arbitrators from any arbitration centers.
- Rules of the arbitration proceedings to resolve the dispute may be agreed by the parties to build or choose from any of the procedural rules of any arbitration centers.
Although arbitration is prescribed in the Vietnamese Commercial Arbitration Act 2010, it is not developed in practice of Vietnam.
The reasons, among others, are ad-hoc arbitration requires the parties themselves to be proactive and skillful in participating in the arbitration proceedings without having any support from a professional arbitration secretariat; and not only the arbitral tribunal but the parties would need to have considerable good experience in arbitration procedure for an efficent outcome of the proceeding.
(ii) Administered arbitration / Insitutional arbitration
Administered/Insitutional arbitration is a type of arbitration which is well-formed, with arbitration institution, and also list of arbitrators.
Arbitrators within the list will operate under the institution’s charter and procedural rules. Most of the major arbitration institutions reputed worldwide are established under such models named arbitration centre, arbitration panel, arbitration institute, national and international arbitral tribunal ... but most arbitration institution is established in the form of arbitration centers.
VIAC is an institutional arbitration centre, having its operations and functions similar to other arbitration institutions in the world such as International Court of Arbitration ICC, Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC), ....
Features:
- Structure of an arbitration institution will includes an executive board, secretariat board and arbitrators of the institution. Co-operation and management of the arbitration institution are generally simple. The Executive Board, normally, are composed of the president, one or more vice presidents and secretary-general. Besides Executive Board, there will be a list of arbitrators who are likely to be available to be appointed to serve as arbitrators resolving cases. Normally, this list has a feature of a recommendations.
Arbitration institution decide their own activities and procedural rules. Within its operating, the institution also has the right to expand and narrow the scope of operation, but must register with the state authority. This feature allows the arbitration institution to hold and operate with specialized arbitration nature (only solve these kinds of certain commercial disputes).
____________________
Mediation and arbitration
Mediation and arbitration features are quite similar to each other such as confidentiality, neutrality, freedom of parties and many more. However, those features still extremely different based on magnitude. Such as freedom of choice, for instance, both arbitration and mediation give parties the right to choose mediator – arbitrator, the main differences is that parties are free to participate or not to participate in the mediation while in arbitration, parties are bound to arbitration agreement and therefore, cannot choose to withdraw from any arbitral procedure.
Binding might be the biggest differences between mediation and arbitration. As mentioned above, parties do not have the right to choose to withdraw from arbitration while they can choose in mediation. On the other hand, arbitral award is final and binding both parties to implement. In the case of mediation, its minute doesn’t bind parties to implement, its enforcement mostly depends on parties’ willingness.
Arbitration, and typically commercial arbitration, is an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) which is agreed by parties of the dispute. Arbitration can be used to replace the traditional way of litigation in court.
Derive from arbitration’s dispute settlement principles, arbitration shows many pros and brings many benefits for parties in commercial dispute, specifically as follows:
A Polish appeals court vacated an International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) partial award for alleged irregularities in the arbitrator's appointment (for further details please see " ICC award set aside due to irregularities in arbitrator's appointment "). The sole arbitrator's final award was also successfully challenged and set aside. The first reason to vacate the final award was also the issue of the sole arbitrator's appointment.
It is normal to inspect the goods that have been lost or damaged during the performance of the sales contract and in the contract of carriage. However, improper inspection can lead to significant disputes and damages that you can refer to below.
The ten years of Law on Commercial Arbitration 2010 (LCA) are also the 10-year development period of VIAC - the first institutional arbitration organization in Vietnam, the organization that goes along with the formation and advancement of the legal framework of commercial arbitration in Vietnam.
Law on Commercial Arbitration (“LCA”) enacted in 2010 was considered a major step forward for the development of commercial arbitration in Vietnam. Compared with the previous years and with international standards, LCA has made remarkable progress, namely recognizing enterprises’ freedom of choice, broadening the scope of arbitration, raising the arbitral tribunal’s authority, valuing court assistance (especially interim measures enforcement), encouraging flexibility in language of arbitration, and improving party’s autonomy in arbitration while maintaining proper manners during arbitral proceedings.
Mr. Doug Jones, a leading arbitrator in the international arbitration community, revealed to me his infatuation with the beautiful beach and Vietnamese delicacies after a seminar in Da Nang. He was also inspired by the confidence, assertiveness, competence and the ambition to improve domestic arbitrators to the same level as those working in the international sphere of young arbitrators and VIAC Secretaries.
Law on Commercial Arbitration 2010 (LCA)- the procedural law governing arbitration proceedings whose seat is in Vietnam
Nowadays, as the digital economy emerges, electronic agreements on online websites are becoming more and more prevalent; hence, the legal effect of establishing terms and conditions of service when accessing the website (browse-wrap) and clicking (click-wrap) are of particular interest. The following paper analyzes some of the legal aspects of online agreement conclusion, especially the establishment of the arbitration agreement by means of browse-wrap and click-wrap.
Whether settling disputes in Court or through arbitration, when a party has the burden of proof, it must submit evidence to the arbitral tribunal. The evidence can be in many different forms: Document electronic evidence, audio recordings, video recordings, witness statement, etc. In international arbitration practice, especially in complex disputes, a type of evidence that is frequently used by the parties to defend their opinion/request is testimony/report of "expert witness".
In international commerce and investment, parties to a dispute often select arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution other than litigation in which the court, an authorized state agency, adjudicate disputes. An explanation for this phenomenon is that arbitration may be the optimal means that the parties can exercise their autonomy in writing to select one or several individuals who are not representing state agencies and state power (the so-called private parties) to resolve disputes. However, to prevent the possibility of arbitrators "privatizing" justice, [1] the New York Convention and the ICSID Convention set out the rules for annulment of arbitral award when such award violates arbitral proceeding. Here, questions arise. What rules of procedure are violated? And to what extent is the commercial and investment arbitral award annulled? This article seeks to elucidate the theory and practice of annulment for violations of procedure under the New York Convention and the ICSID Convention.
Goods can be consolidated, batched, packed, sorted, and grouped for a certain period of time before being loaded onto a trailer for carriage to the consignee. Disputes about whether the time to do these things are within the scope of insurance liability or not is an issue worth knowing (through the lawsuit with the documents of a foreign law firm) below for readers’ reference.
Mr. Vu Anh Duong is the Secretary General of the Vietnam International Arbitration Centre (“ VIAC “), which is the leading Vietnamese arbitration and mediation institution . Mr. Duong has contributed significantly to the development of arbitration in Vietnam in various ways; in addition to his role with the VIAC, Mr. Duong has served as a member of various drafting committees dealing with not only the VIAC’s Rules of Arbitration (2017) (“ VIAC Rules ”), but also Vietnam’s arbitration-related legislation. He also regularly lectures on commercial arbitration and sits as an arbitrator in both international and domestic commercial arbitrations.
Abstract: This discourse focuses on a detailed analysis of some theoretical and practical issues about the application of interim emergency measures involving third parties, in the field of domestic and international. Besides, the discourse provides measures to enhance the ability to enforce the decisions applying interim emergency measures with the third parties within the realm of international arbitration law. Subsequently, it extracts experience and recommendations pertaining to the legal framework in Vietnam regarding this matter.
During arbitral proceedings, the mediation process may cause some certain conflicts that requests the Arbitral Tribunal to seriously consider. Resolving effectively these conflicts based on fundamental legal principles and the arbitration skills of the Tribunal will ensure the rights and interests of disputing parties and third parties. This discourse focuses on analyzing potential conflicts and providing recommendations to the Tribunal to maximize the effectiveness of the mediation process and reduce conflict occurrence.
According to the Department of Judicial Support , Ministry of Justice, currently , there have been 48 arbitration institutions established in our country, with over 600 arbitrators participating in resolving thousands of commercial disputes each year 1 . An arbitration service has been developed. Along with the growth , the trait of this service became more apparent , includi ng the relevance of third-party interests. Unlike court litigation, in principle, arbitration is a private dispute resolution method , therefore, the involvement of third parties is exceptional. The discourse discusses how the arbitral tribunal considers and guarantee s the third party's interest in the arbitra l proceedings by providing some situations in which disputing parties or the arbitral tribunal may need to consider the interests of third parties. The goal of arbitr ation is to make contributions to resolving disputes fairly, thereby encourag ing parties to fulfill their obligations voluntarily in order to avoid further dispute escalation of disputes . Based on the analysis , the author suggests policy improvements pertaining to third parties that may be considered in the upcoming revision of the Law on Commercial Arbitration.
In August 2024, the International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA) formally published the second edition of the ICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention. The Guide is a clear, concise yet inclusive handbook, written in plain language, on the essential aspects of the scope, interpretation and application of the Convention. Though principally aimed at judges determining applications under the Convention, the Guide, which benefits from the extensive practical and academic experience of its authors (prominent arbitrators and ICCA members) will also be of interest to students, teachers and practitioners as an introduction to the Convention.
Asia Business Law Journal recently conducted research and announced the list of Vietnam's Top 100 Lawyers in 2024, which includes 19 Listed Arbitrators of Vietnam International Arbitration Center (VIAC) and Listed Mediators of Vietnam Mediation Centre (VMC) – a division of VIAC.
On 28 th October 2025, Mr. Vu Anh Duong, Permanent Vice President cum Secretary General of VIAC, shared his perspective at the Asia Civil law Summit, held as a part of events series under the Seoul ADR Festival – SAF 2025. Organized by the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB), the event brought together a large number of experts from leading law firms, corporations, arbitration institutions, and mediation organizations across the region and around the world.
As Vietnam’s economy continues to grow rapidly and integrates into the global market, arbitration has become a common, favoured method of dispute resolution for investors, suppliers and businesses. Since the pandemic, there has been a significant rise in both domestic arbitration cases and international hearings involving parties located in Vietnam.
Building on the success of the third edition, VIAC’s Listed Arbitrator Gary B. Born has published the fourth edition of International Arbitration: Law and Practice, offering updated insights and refined perspectives on contemporary arbitration practice.
To begin the AMS 2025, on the morning of March 14, 2025, the Vietnam International Arbitration Centre (VIAC), in collaboration with the College of Economics, Law and Government, under UEH University (CELG-UEH), organized Workshop 01: “Time efficiency in arbitration under the effect of parallel proceedings” . The Workshop attracted nearly 200 participants, including arbitrators, mediators, lawyers, in-house counsels, and other legal professionals.
Continuing the first Workshop of the AMS 2025 series, on the morning of March 21, 2025, Workshop 02 “Strategies for enhancing time efficiency through the combination of Arbitration and Mediation” was held under the joint coordination of Vietnam International Arbitration Centre (VIAC) and HCMC University of Economics and Finance (UEF). The Workshop attracted the participation of over 150 delegates, including a significant number of arbitrators, mediators, lawyers, in-house counsels, and legal professionals.
In the afternoon of March 28, 2025, the Workshop 03 “Controlling time for submission of evidence in Arbitration” was held under the joint coordination of Vietnam International Arbitration Centre (VIAC) and University of Economics and Law (UEL), Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City. The Workshop attracted the participation of over 100 delegates, including legal experts, arbitrators, lawyers, and lecturers, as well as students from legal training institutions, all of whom share an interest in arbitration in particular and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods in general.